Cahaya Green
Client satisfaction and testimonials
Client Feedback

What Our Clients Say About Working with Cahaya Green

Feedback from project managers, compliance officers, and operations directors who have worked with our environmental law team across Malaysia.

Back to Home

240+

Engagements completed

12+

Years in environmental law

98%

Retainer client retention

4.8

Average client rating

Client Reviews

Feedback from Clients Across Malaysia

"We instructed Cahaya Green for a Detailed EIA submission in Sandakan involving a coastal infrastructure project. Their legal review of the consultant's draft caught two procedural gaps that would almost certainly have triggered a DOE request for additional information. The submission went through with a single clarification query — which was manageable. I'd been through a much more drawn-out process on a previous project with a different adviser, and the difference was noticeable."

MR

Mohd Razif bin Hasan

Project Director — Sandakan, Sabah

January 2026

"After we received a show-cause notice from the DOE in relation to an effluent discharge exceedance, we contacted Cahaya Green on a Monday morning. They had reviewed the notice and sent us an initial assessment of our legal position by Wednesday. The clear-headed advice in those first days made a significant difference to how we approached the regulatory response. The matter was resolved without further enforcement action over the following weeks."

LJ

Lee Jing Wen

Environmental Compliance Manager — Johor

February 2026

"The permit management retainer has simplified our compliance operations considerably. We had been renewing licences in-house but found the DOE's paperwork requirements increasingly complex as the regulations changed. Handing this to Cahaya Green has meant we no longer worry about renewal deadlines, and the quarterly review calls have actually been useful for understanding how recent regulatory updates might affect our air emission reporting obligations."

SP

Suria Prakash

Operations Director — Kuching, Sarawak

March 2026

"What I appreciated was that the advice was specific. We'd spoken to another legal firm before contacting Cahaya Green, and the guidance we received there was quite generic — essentially a summary of the Act without any real insight into how the DOE interprets it in practice. Cahaya Green's team knew the procedural expectations at DOE Sabah specifically, and that precision was exactly what we needed for our Preliminary EIA."

NA

Nur Aisyah binti Zulkifli

Land Developer — Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

December 2025

"Our facility had an incident involving scheduled waste disposal that drew DOE attention. Rajan from Cahaya Green guided us through the liability assessment and helped us prepare a remediation plan that was accepted by the DOE within the first round of review. I have to be honest — we were in a fairly uncertain position legally when we first called, and the engagement gave us a structured way to address the situation."

KT

Kelvin Tan Wei Liang

General Manager — Penang

January 2026

"Azrina's advice on the terms of reference for our palm oil mill EIA was detailed and clearly based on up-to-date DOE guidance. She also flagged that our project boundary would bring it within a distance threshold requiring additional consultation steps — something our environmental consultant had not flagged. That early identification saved us from a submission that would have been returned. The fee for the engagement was well-proportioned to the value of the outcome."

IH

Ibrahim bin Hamzah

Mill Manager — Tawau, Sabah

February 2026


Case Studies

Engagements in Depth

The following summaries describe three representative engagements, presented with identifying details changed to protect client confidentiality.

EIA Advisory

Coastal Resort Development EIA — Sabah

Challenge

A resort developer was required to conduct a Detailed EIA for a project adjacent to a marine protected area. The client's environmental consultant produced a draft report that Cahaya Green was asked to review before submission. The draft contained a procedural omission regarding the public display period — which would have caused the DOE to reject the submission without review.

Our Approach

We identified the omission and advised on the specific public notice and display requirements under the Environmental Quality (Prescribed Activities) Order. We also reviewed the terms of reference compliance and produced a regulatory checklist for the consultant's use during the revised submission process.

Outcome

The revised submission was accepted by the DOE for review without procedural objection. The DOE issued conditional approval within four months of submission — within the client's project planning timeline. The correction of the omission prior to submission avoided an estimated 3–4 month delay.

"The process was much cleaner than I expected given the complexity of the site. The review flagged the issue before it became a problem." — Project Manager, Sabah resort developer

Pollution Liability

DOE Enforcement Response — Manufacturing Facility

Challenge

A manufacturing facility received a DOE compound notice following an effluent sampling inspection that showed exceedances of licensed discharge parameters. The client faced potential prosecution and was uncertain whether to contest the compound or negotiate a settlement with corrective action commitments.

Our Approach

We conducted a regulatory exposure review, assessed the sampling methodology used by the DOE officers for legal adequacy, and advised on the client's options. We recommended negotiating a settlement with a documented corrective action plan rather than contesting the compound, and prepared the settlement correspondence and corrective action commitment documentation.

Outcome

The compound was settled at the standard rate with an accepted corrective action timeline. No prosecution was initiated. The client subsequently engaged Cahaya Green on a monthly retainer for ongoing permit compliance management to reduce the likelihood of recurrence.

Permit Management

Permit Portfolio Transition — Industrial Operator

Challenge

An industrial operator with multiple sites across Sabah had been managing their environmental licences internally. Following a staff restructure, they found their licence renewal tracking inadequate — two licences had lapsed without the organisation being aware, creating a period of inadvertent non-compliance.

Our Approach

We conducted a full permit audit across all sites, identified the lapsed licences, and prioritised their reinstatement with the DOE. We then established a structured permit register covering all licences, renewal dates, and monitoring submission schedules, and transitioned the client to our monthly retainer.

Outcome

Lapsed licences were reinstated within six weeks with no enforcement action. The client has now maintained continuous compliance across all sites for over twelve months on the retainer. The internal compliance team has been relieved of licence tracking responsibilities entirely.

Contact

Reach Our Team

Office

Level 10, Wisma Sabah
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

Credentials

Professional Memberships & Recognition

Malaysian Bar Council

Current practising certificates

DOE EIA Practitioners

Recognised under the Environmental Quality Act

IUCN Environmental Law

Affiliate member network

Sabah Law Society

Environment & natural resources committee

Add Your Organisation to Our Client List

We welcome new enquiries from developers, industrial operators, and project managers looking for reliable, focused environmental law advisory.

Contact Cahaya Green